Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Hello gopalnagarsociety plot owners

Dear plot owners I found today that the blog gopalnagarsociety.blogspot.com is closed.
Please use this blog to post your comments and discussions and this owned by me, a owner of plots in Gopalnagar and will never get closed.

Thanks
Prasad
http://blog.charasala.com (this is my own telugu blog)

13 comments:

gopalnagarhousingsocity said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gopalnagarhousingsocity said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
gopalnagarhousingsocity said...

Hi All,

Here are the previous comments posted by the members. I copied them two before removing the blog.

Thanks,
Sasi.

Sushma marupati said...
I am M.Renuka; Plot number 661.I am having few concerns regarding this indu Project agreement.
1)I am having 300 sq yards North East plot. So as per the agreement I will get 3000 sq feet constructed area. Please tell me how much corpate area I will get for this 3000 sq feet.
2)This is North facing plot. Now which face apartment I will get after this construction.
3)Please tell me what are the extra payments we need to pay while delivering these apartments.
4)Please provide us with the sample apartment designs.
Suggetions:1) Provide us with 10 sq .Ft of saleable area excluding the common areas per each sq.yard.Don ‘t add this common area to this 10 sq .feet.
I feel this is good channel to express our ideas. Thanks to core team to working for this project.

Renuka
08727-252420
09440088638
09440044786

July 23, 2008 8:24 PM


kumar said...
HI This is Kumar, I am owner of Plot no 345.
I am also having the concern abt this "10 sq .Ft of saleable including common area". so we are really not sure how much actual usable area we are going to get.
My plot also corner plot and North Facing. so I also need to have my Flat North facing only. I think this is better idea to allot these Flats based on their plot facing.

Core team we are really thankful to all you effort, and we all should be as team and support this...Thanks!

July 24, 2008 7:52 AM


Arun Kulkarni said...
My name is Arun Kulkarni (plot# 785). I read the draft of the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT-CUM-GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY. I would like to know how units will be allocated to respective owners. I understand that it is the responsibility of the Society to allocate the units. Is there any MOU or agreement regarding allocation of units?
Thank you.

July 24, 2008 3:50 PM


venkata said...
Venkat
Plot No 399 and 400:
Why should we agree to the fact that 65 or so acres are being used by the developer for villas. What purpose does it serve the land owners.
Why can't the developer build only apartments for his share and owners share so that apartments need not be build in just 25 acres but in all of 90plus acres. This way the apartments can be very well spaced and need not go 14 floors or so. It can be built like a very good colony, self-sufficient in itself.
Hope members concur with me on this.

August 1, 2008 11:05 AM


kumar said...
Yes I agree with Venkat. This is a valid Point.

August 1, 2008 12:02 PM


Jagadish said...
Jagadish (Plot no. 860)

I appreciate for the society working towards building a great township.

I agree with Ms. Sushma that 10 sft/yard and providing an apartment plan would be an appropriate.

I would like to know how these apartment are being built. Many of us will get 3000 sft, Can we have the choice between two three bedroom apartments; or one each two and four bedroom for 300 sq. yard

According to the agreement, we are not eligible for independent villas. Since independent villas are many of their dream, can we have an option to choose independent villas with some compensation?

Can we have the option to dispose a land to the builder after signing the agreement?

I would have preferred mixing the apartments through out the venture rather than in one corner.

I hope this project would be suceesful.

August 4, 2008 7:53 PM


ప్రసాద్ said...
My name is Prasad. I think all of you can understand Telugu. So let me express myself in telugu.

MOU చదివాక అర్థమయ్యిందేమిటంటే ఒక చదరపు యార్డు స్థలానికి 10 చదరపు అడుగుల (కామన్ ఏరియాతో కలిపి) అమ్మదగిన స్థలం ఇస్తారు. ఇలా స్థలం యజమానికి ఇచ్చేదాన్ని యూనిట్ అనుకుంటే ఇలా యజమానులకు ఇచ్చే యూనిట్లన్నీ కూడా ఇప్పుడున్న మొత్తం స్థలంలో పాతిక శాతం స్థలంలోనే. అంటే మొత్తం స్థలం 3,30,000 చదరపు యార్డులయితే స్థల యజమానులకు దక్కేది 82,500 చదరపు యార్డులు. అదికూడా డెవలపరు ఏ మూల కేటాయిస్తే ఆమూల సరిపెట్టుకోవాలి. ఇక డెవలపరుకు దక్కిన 2,47,500 చదరపు యార్డుల్లో తను ఏమి కట్టినా మనం అడగ్గూడదు. అక్కడొక క్లబ్బు పెట్టినా, బారు పెట్టినా లేక మరేదయినా అడిగే హక్కు సొసైటీకి వుండదు. పైగా ఈ MOU అమల్లోకి వస్తే అది ఏ నాసిరకంగా కట్టినా, యజమానికి నచ్చకపోయినా యజమాని సొసైటీకి చెప్పుకోవల్సిందే తప్ప డెవలపరుని అడిగే హక్కుండదు.

ఇదంతా ఎలా వుందంటే మనకున్న 300 యార్డుల్లో ఓ మూలన 75 యార్డుల్లో ఓ గుడిసె వేయించి ఇచ్చినందులకు మిగిలిన 275 యార్డులూ మేడ కట్టుకునే వాడికి డారపోసినట్లుంది. ఆ తర్వాత ఆ మేడ యజమాని దయాదాక్షిణ్యాల మీద ఈ 75 యార్డుల గుడిసె వాడు అణిగిమణిగి బ్రతకాలన్నమాట!

హతవిధీ!

--ప్రసాద్
http://blog.charasala,.com

August 10, 2008 9:18 PM


kumar said...
One more Shocking news. It seems the society recived a Notice , that ULC land will be handed over to HUDA. Details: It seems few acres of land is under ULC, and will be handed over to HUDA. We have our registration done, inspite of that, and No one has idea about that. Itseems it is very hard to find which part of it is under ULC, and in this scenario it affects every one. Not sure what is going to be done now.

August 11, 2008 8:34 AM


venkata said...
Got an email from one of the members of the society there was going to be an emergency meeting last sunday but got cancelled because of heavy rains. Their intent was to discuss taking over of land under ULC by HUDA. Hope they will have a meeting soon and we all get to know which plots are affected. If anyone has any details about this please let the members know. I really appreciate sharing of information.

August 12, 2008 1:14 PM


JD said...
A meeting is scheduled on 17th Aug2008 at 1000Hrs at the function hall near society's office.
The twists and turns on these sites over years are more than the daily serials in the TV shows.

August 14, 2008 1:06 AM


Dharma Rao said...
I have taken plot in Gopal nagar society in 2005, since that time I been attending all society meetings, its like formality kind of meetings.

In last four years no development work, Finally most of plot owners decided to give land to Developer( Indu Projects), since he has good infrastructure for construction and has very close relationship with ruling Govt.

He can get all necessary permissions and clearences very fast, once we all agree for development.

In specifications they have mentioned all 4.3 million sft in 25 acres only (including 1 millin sft belongs to developer), it means we cannot get proper ventillation as well as air and no privacy, since most of APT towers very close, May be like another Malaysia township kind of thing in KPHB.
They will construct these plots in one corner of entire society.

Excluding 25 acres, remaining land 67 acres they have exclusive rights (constructing villas and selling).

My concerns/suggstions are
1) They could have construct all apts in entire society land with 10 floors instead of 14 or 15 floors, they can sell their share of APts, with this atleast we can expect good quality construction.

2) If they want to get some land for their villas/corporate office space, at least they should construct Apts for society members in 40 acers (4.3 millins sft ),
they will get 52 acres instead of 67 acres.

3) Instead of villas in 67 acres by Developr, they can construct for corporate office space, if software companies are closer , it will be fetch good value for our flats,


Our society core committe needs to negotiate all these things, finally I can say, instead of keeping our prime land vacant another 10 or 15 years (in mean time some one will occupy completely), better to give it to Developer only, I lost hopes on society committe for Development.

Many thanks ,those who created this blog for sharing our common thoughts.

I can be reached at drpaleti@yahoo.com

August 14, 2008 12:20 PM


rk said...
Hai everybody,
Today was the first time I attended a meeting.I enjoyed it better than any comedy show.

1.The said G.O. said few Acres are to be taken over by HUDA. Which part is not specifically mentioned, I am further sure without identifying the particular area Govt cannot pass such orders.It is mandatory that particular part be disclosed.

2.Its ridiculous to discuss about anything without a tentative plan of construction.

3.It is very difficult to get such a big land ,logically we have the upper hand (Inspite of so called short comings).It was announced as if Indu constructiond is showing mercy .

4.I am surprised the way in which some of the speakers insisting not to budge for less than 10 Sq.ft.Whose lucky number is that 10 no one disclosed.We could still negotiate by giving a open advertisement to all reputed builders.
5.Why only Indu projects? today every big company has all capabilities of overcoming any kind of problems.

6.I heard them announcing 800 people alredy signed.I really doubt because I found about 10 to 12 small groups of atleast 7-10 in a group whispering that they have not signed and or not for it.

7.Say for instance Indu projects is only capable of doing the venture.In next 6 months who is going to form the Govt. No one is sure and what could be the new Govts policy.We waited for all these years and feel nothing wrong in waiting for few more months.

8.A person having 300 Sq.yards can construct atleast 2200 sq ft per floor and when he joins with other he gets permission of about 5 floors 2200*5 equals 11,000 Sqft,even if we comprimise of 35% on account of short comings it calculates to about 3850 Sqft. (market share is about 45-50%).we can imagine what could be our share when the developer constructs 10 or above floors.


Last but not the least.It is suggeted that all members mention their contact details, as there being valuable suggestions and Ideas.

Padma Rao Lakkaraju.
9392293939

August 17, 2008 10:09 AM


ప్రసాద్ said...
Regarding howmany people have signed the MOU.
In my case when I have visited the society ofice they asked me to sign in a note book and I thought it is just like a visitors book and I have signed it.
But seems now they are claiming all the signatories in that book are agreed for the MOU.
At least in my case it is wrong.

Regarding the recent govt. order: Is it another gimmik to just pressure the members to sign any deal in favor of the builder? How can the govt just like take the land which has been registered legally to many people all over these years can be taken by the govt with one single order?? What a pitiable condition we are in!!!

August 18, 2008 8:10 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Prasad Garu,
Usually MoU will be of many pages and all the pages needs to be signed.

August 18, 2008 9:02 AM


annu said...
satyanarayana-what ever itis the situation is going tobe very horible,if not indu some other company may takeup the issue with the same litigations,conditions.earlier all members are in the dark what will happen to our plots,how the problems are solved like courtcase,zoneconversion,regularisationtion,ulc,permission permission forhouse construction etc,the situation was horible,but we have a way to overcome from all above problems.whatever iam going to say it's all my personal feelings,this is the right time to take a wise decission,no one get bonaza when ever they want,time comes once in life time it may for good or bad ,i strongle believe in 'GOD'We all purchaged the plots with hard earned money why we should wait for a longer time to eat a rapped fruit.
SATYANARAYANA M
9848590922
HYD

August 18, 2008 9:05 AM


Raju said...
Hi all,

Thank you RK, Prasad, Annu for the info you have provided about the meeting and your opinion.

I have some questions.

1)What was finally decided in the meeting?

2)What was the general opinion of the people attended the meeting?

3)As the society people are propagating are there many unsolvable issues?

4)Is society not in a position to develop the land, so that we can construct our houses.Is it out of our hands now? Why are they pushing so hard to have an agreement with INDU?

5)Out of 1100 of members, assume only 600 people signed on MOU of INDU. Will the society give only their land to INDU? If so what about the fate of rest of people? Will they be allotted some portion of land? If so different society will be formed and be able to protect from land grabbers?

I think I have asked too many question. If any one provides info I would appreciate it.

Thank you,
Raju.

August 18, 2008 3:56 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Raju Garu,
Almost all your questions answered in the posts made.One simple common sense fact we all are not understanding is ,before indu projects episode our society ppl were claiming we need to pay some amount and the society will solve all the problems.Suddenly a twist took place contrary that we are all help less and only OKKA MAGADU indu projects only can solve it.
As far as Satyanarayana garu comments concerned I agree with him had we got atleast 75% of what we deserve.But its being picturised as if we loose 100% if we dont budge to vague terms and conditions of Indu projects

August 19, 2008 1:18 AM


Balu said...
నా పెరు బాల సుబ్రమణ్యం , మాకు గొపాల్ నగర్ సొసైటి లొ ఒక ప్లొట్ ఉంది.
ధర్మా రావు గారు చెప్పినాటు సొసైటి వాల్లు ఇంకొసరి ఇందు వాల్ల థొ మాత్లదిథె బాగ ఉంటుందని అనిపిస్తుంది.

వివరాలొకి వెలిథె ఇందు వాలు 17 ఫ్లూర్స్ బదులు 10 ఫ్లూర్స్ కదిథె బాగ ఉంతుంది
అదీ కాక అప్పర్త్మెంట్స్ కి వెంతిలతిఒన్ కూడ సరిగ్గ వస్తుంది.

సొసైటి వల్లు మరియు టీం వాల్లు ఇంది థొ మాత్లదాలని నా మనవి.

ఇత్లు సుబ్రమణ్యం

August 19, 2008 5:30 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Plz give ur contact numbers

August 19, 2008 7:00 AM


kishore said...
all, lets start a group ( yahoo or google) and start communicating. we should form a strong voice and talk to society and Indu.
i know society is talking about the possibility of loosing the land.
But the gain for INDUis enormous. think about what he can do in the remaining 62 acres. its too good a deal for INDU to loose, so they will agree for better offer.

i would suggest, lets talk to other real estate companies, i am sure other companies can come up with better offer.
once we have another company with a better offer, then there are only options for the society.
1.) agree to the new offer from the new company OR
2.) make INDU give a better offer

inorder for us to do, we all need to be united and make a strong voice.

society will not do this as they have vested interests.

i request lets get toether

thanks
kishore

August 19, 2008 9:17 AM


kishore said...
all, lets start a group ( yahoo or google) and start communicating. we should form a strong voice and talk to society and Indu.
i know society is talking about the possibility of loosing the land.
But the gain for INDUis enormous. think about what he can do in the remaining 62 acres. its too good a deal for INDU to loose, so they will agree for better offer.

i would suggest, lets talk to other real estate companies, i am sure other companies can come up with better offer.
once we have another company with a better offer, then there are only options for the society.
1.) agree to the new offer from the new company OR
2.) make INDU give a better offer

inorder for us to do, we all need to be united and make a strong voice.

society will not do this as they have vested interests.

i request lets get toether

thanks
kishore

August 19, 2008 9:17 AM


Satya said...
I also have a plot in gopal nagar society, which I bought in 2005.

From the day I bought the plot I attended all the meetings they conducted, couple of things I do not understand about the society people are

1 -> Initially during the meetings they promised lot of things like: layout of roads, electricity, layout and planning of sewage etc (basic facilities we need to construct a house).

2 -> They kept on extending for 6 months for all the basic facilities needed as mentioned above.

3 -> I really got frustrated and asked them during one of the meetings about all the tings they promised.

4 -> During one of the meetings society people said that L&T came and looked at the land and were interested, and they also mentioned that L&T is thinking of offering for every 100 sq yards they give 1500 sq feet of constructed area and only apartments will be constructed. I wonder why society people did not like the deal offered by L&T, I am guessing may be there is not much financial benefit for them.

5 -> Look at the deal Indu project is offering, as every one is mentioning we do not know which apartment we get and why will anyone in the right mind will agree for this deal. Entire land is ours and they will construct apartments at one corner and use the other for their own.

6 -> I am 100% sure that society people have lot of financial benefit with this deal, why do they care about us, if they did they would have done all the things they promised.

7 -> Even though society people are telling every one that 80% of us signed MOU I am pretty sure that they are lying from their teeth on our face.

more coming.....

August 19, 2008 1:01 PM


annu said...
I,too agree with those who suggested other companies for dovelop our land is very good idea ,but who bells the cat ,plz come out , the hole members are behind you.i,request all the members kindle take a wise dessicion before close the time ,the govt is dead lined i,e 31-8-08.i am a middle class person i con't think more then this . i think,all the members will agree and support for better.

August 20, 2008 10:28 AM


Kishore said...
Not sure we have much options as of now. Go with the majority of the people. Otherwise, we need to form "counter" society and fight against this.

Not sure who takes the lead.

Let's hope for the best.

August 22, 2008 8:24 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Hai every body,
Todays development is it was discovered with great difficulty that only a part of Survey No.s 150 and 151 only are under ULC.so almost 900 people are likely not to fall in the ULC purview.As kishore said We need to form a strong voice.Many people are working in their individual capacity.One person today handovered me master plan as well as lay out of our plots,which shown that ours is residential zone.no need of zone conversion.I request all of us to give their phone numbers.I keep all the developments updated.Be in touch

Padma Rao Lakkaraju
9392293939

August 22, 2008 8:52 AM


Comment deleted
This post has been removed by the author.

August 22, 2008 11:08 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear friends,
I think godess of luck is favouring us.another threat society was posing to us is governament ma acquire our lands.Revenue minister yesterday announced Govt will not acquire private lands from here onwards.see page 10 Andhra Jyothi dtd 23.08.2008
Padmarao
9392293939

August 22, 2008 9:41 PM


Murty Cheruvu said...
I am C.S.R. Murty, owner of Plot No. 801. I have the following suggestions for the committee members:
1) The oral agreement of the developer to Buy/Sell Square feet @ 3500/- at the time of completion of the unit must be incorporated into the development agreement.
2) The constructed units must be directly allotted to the owners by the developers in consultation with the representatives of the society.
3) Access to the common facilities present for the villas should be available to us, as is the case of our club house being accessible to the owners of the villas.
4) The owner should not be made responsible for any third party settlements either by legal disputes or otherwise, except for the defects in the title of the individual plot.
5) If any amount is paid to the GHMC / ULC with respect to regularization by the owners should be reimbursed by the developer and the same should be incorporated into the development agreement

Hope to see these issues addressed by the core committee.

Thanks and regards,
C.S.R. Murty

August 23, 2008 9:58 AM


Dr. Jayaram said...
Hi There,

This is Ram from US. I got 4 plots in Gopa(pa)l Nagar Society. I think, these guys will discontinue this blog when they noticed that we are voicing against to them and sharing our views. Lets start a yahoo groups or google groups sothat we will be in touch till this issue settle.

August 23, 2008 11:11 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dr.Jaya Ram Garu,
We are not basically against socity.We are collecting our selves and enlighting our selves with the issues.Our object is the best bargain.

Padma Rao LakkaRaju

August 24, 2008 3:55 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Friends ,
A ggod news is that Honble court has given stay on the G.O. issued by Govt regarding handovering of Land to HUDA.

Many people are going and paying ULC to be on safer side.Along with DD they need to have EC and link documents.I am going to put Link documents on net soon

Padma Rao Lakkaraju

August 24, 2008 3:58 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
PPl can join the orkut group called modifymou

August 24, 2008 4:17 AM


Raj said...
Plots which are likely to be under ULC.56 to 73,413,414,433,453 to 484 ,503 to 532,551 to 580, 599,606,607,608,609,622 to 628,824 to 832 and all plots that were puchased in open land.This in not final information.its only orally given by ULC authorities.posting only as sharing of information

August 24, 2008 4:38 AM


muralivyshu said...
muralikrishna
hai friends;Iam murali:Hai friends iam having so many doubts on tis mou, why because society people told me before the taught of indu group, we r going for development by that we will get 18 sq.ft per yard the builders L&T,DLF and DHUBAI companies are coming for we will choose one of them,Now the situation totally changed the HINDU projects came but they are ready to give very less it is not comaparable previous told by the society.Everybody knows it is very costly area,
1.Iam very thankful to society,The society is not elected by plot owner of the gopalnagar society enentough they are saved the venture.
2.I given developement one plot nearer to the chandanagar by that iam getting 50% of the construted area and financial benfit also there iam getting 14 sft/yard they r constructing only G+3 here we r going to construct 14 floors. how much we r going to get in this not getting any financial benfit.
3.Society showing so many problems is really there r not?if there how we will get 18sft/yard after coming indu projects these r appearing in the picture.
3.iam suggesting to the society people please try to get more benifits to the plot owners,society people as well as builder.here everybody knows builder getting more benifit.
4.Iam giving one suggestion to builder out of 300 yards,construct two buildings each having 150 yards.it is better and it is very costly area we have to share 50%.

August 24, 2008 11:59 PM


Kishore said...
Hi all,
Can some one validate "Raj"s post..

Plots which are likely to be under ULC.56 to 73,413,414,433,453 to 484 ,503 to 532,551 to 580, 599,606,607,608,609,622 to 628,824 to 832 and all plots that were puchased in open land.This in not final information.its only orally given by ULC authorities.posting only as sharing of information

August 25, 2008 2:30 AM


Pr Reddy said...
Hello All,

I own one of the plots which fall in above ULC listing. Can some one tell what is the complication. This plot is registered. Is it possible to register with no ULC clearance. I thought it was not under ULC act. I am not interested in INDU development project as their offer is a way below normal demand. But is there a plan to keep your self out from this project being a member in society and majority people already agreed for development.
I think we need to create another group or blog to disucss more in detail before this blog is blocked incase.

Thanks,

August 25, 2008 10:51 AM


Raj said...
PR Reddy,
why dont u talk to padmarao 9392293939

August 26, 2008 1:39 AM


gopalnagarsociety said...
we request to post your Plot No, Phone No. and Email to serve you better.

The Development Agreement need some modifications in it. it is still in discussion. it will be finalized within a week.
The moment its been finalized we'll inform everyone in everyway possible.

And the last date for ULC is 30-08-08


Thank you

August 26, 2008 1:41 AM


gopalnagarsociety said...
The Society will not Block this Blog at any cost. we require your suggestions, please put forward all your suggestions.

All your questions will be answered soon.
please leave your Plot No. and phone no and email id so that we can get in touch with you.

if you have any further doubts you can come to the society office and clarify your doubts.

Thank you
GOPALNAGAR SOCIETY

August 26, 2008 3:07 AM


INDU said...
What Society(Suribabu in a meeting) said is we can demand for more SFT per sq. yard once we get 800-850 applications. Now i do not know why society is not talking about it.

Can Society/Suribabu answer my question?

August 26, 2008 8:18 AM


INDU said...
Also 10 SFT per Sq.Yd is including common area.

Defitely it would not cross 7.5 SFR per YARD excluding common area.

Means roughly we get 2200-2300 SFT per 300 Sq. Yards plot.

If society can arrange Electricity, Drainage & Roads, we can construct our houses and no one can not do any thing.

August 26, 2008 8:27 AM


Satya said...
Hi Friends,

I am extremely sorry to inform you this, after seeing Raj's comment I went to verify the plots that are under ULC and some of them are correct, mine is also under ULC, this shows how supportive are the society people to us, they did not even inform us, please make necessary arrangements because the dead line is only 2 days away.

August 27, 2008 12:47 AM


Raj said...
Dear Satya,
There are so many issues which are not seeing light.its good u pay for ULC but there is a rule according to which ,its the owner who can decide which land is to be taken by Govt.

August 27, 2008 2:10 AM


Raju said...
Hi Satya,

Where did you verify whethere our plot numbers comes under ULC or not?
Any address,phone number or the contact person name is helpful.So that we could also check our plot numbers.

Thank you,
Dharma.

August 27, 2008 6:56 AM


Kishore said...
Here is the GO no 985:

REVENUE (UC.I) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No. 985 Dated: 02.08.2008
ORDER:
The Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 has been
repealed by the Government of India by enacting the U.L. (C&R)
Repeal Act 1999 (Central Act1 15 of 1999). Consequently, the A.P.
Legislature adopted the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Repeal Act,
1999 by passing a resolution on 27.3.2008 and it has come into force
in the State of Andhra Pradesh with effect from 27.3.2008 in place of
Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976.
(2) Whereas consequent on adoption of Urban Land (Ceiling &
Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, under section 3 (1) (a) of the said Act,
the excess land which was vested with the Government under Section
10 (3) of the Principal Act and possession of which has been taken
over by the Government shall not affect the Repeal of Principal Act,
1976.
(3) Whereas in CC No.H1/7496/76, an extent of 64216.00 sq.mtrs.
(Acrs.15.37gts.) in Sy.Nos.148 to 155 of Hydernagar (V), Balanagar
(M), Ranga Reddy District was determined as surplus land and it has
been vested with the Government under Section 10 (3) of the Principal
Act and possession of which has been taken over by the S.O. & C.A.,
ULC., Hyderabad and handed over to the Tahsildar concerned/Enquiry
Officer of Spl. Officer’s Office, Hyderabad for safe custody.
(4) Whereas the Government after careful examination of the matter
have decided to allot the above surplus land to the Hyderabad Urban
Development Authority , Hyderabad for optimum utilization of the land
in the best public interest.
(5) Now, therefore the Government hereby allot the land to an
extent of 64216.00 sq.mtrs. (Acrs.15.37gts.) in Sy.Nos.148 to 155 of
Hydernagar (V), Balanagar (M), Ranga Reddy District in favour of
Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, Hyderabad for Public
purpose.
…2...
:: 2 ::
(6) The Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling,
Hyderabad / District Collector, Ranga Reddy District is requested to
take further necessary action accordingly.
(BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH)
K. RATNA PRABHA
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

August 27, 2008 7:21 AM


Lakshman said...
Hi All,

I just want to share some news on ULC. The total ULC land in Gopalnagar is 14.xx,in this land 5 acres was exempted by the Government. so only 9.xx is under ULC which is fall under 150/p and 151/p servey numbers. Other servey numbers are not in the ULC. The detailed layout plan in servey numbers wise with ULC bounderies must exist with Gopalnagr society body members. If they want to really help to the members they can put all the details in this site or in our office instead of insisting about the GPA/MOU/ULC applications. If they can share this info each individual member who has the plot in ULC boundery can pay the amount to government to make protect their land from Government first. Then we can think of development/INDU/L&T etc.

Request you to Suribabu,please help the members first by providing the 150 & 151 servey number plot details which are in the ULC as per GO. We do not have much time to waste.

August 27, 2008 11:13 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
So many people are calling me regarding the details about ULC.I am here with posting the details
for the frequently asked questions.

Regarding ULC: Its the owner who has to decide which part of land can be taken by Govt.(i.e.)oF 94 acres which part can be handovered can be decided by society.As on date Govt Says its 150/p & 151/p.

If society has to take the burden, they may need to pay approx 2crores

I dont think any developer can pay on behalf of us as we are yet to get into agreement.which is uncertain.

regularisation in ulc:Its always better that we pay ULC amount.In case if we dont fall in its purview,Govt will return the amount.

How to regularise in ULC:Go along with photo copy of ur plot papers to 3rd Chandra Vihar,Opp: exhibition grounds and take application for Rs.50.The concerned officer will giv the amount need to be paid.

Need to submit form along with encumberence certificate and link documents.

I once again request u ppl to post ur details.It will be helpful for every one.


Padmarao

August 27, 2008 12:23 PM


Parakala said...
Hi Friends,

This is Raja owner of 2 plots. I found below information on web.
Here is the G.O.Ms.No.747 for download for your reference. It is application for ULC submission. I am not sure we can take print out and submit same form. Please check before.
Application form Link: http://www.bharatlawyer.com/articles.php with in this page you can find last article » G.O.No747 dt.18-6-2008 link.
Or u can provide your email and get GO. http://www.bharatlawyer.com/popup_email.php?id=72

I am requesting you all please share information regarding. It would helpful.

Regards,
Raja

August 27, 2008 7:20 PM


gopalnagarsociety said...
Every ULC form has a unique Application No. which the govt. may use for records. so we request everyone to take the application form from the Govt. Office or from Society office.

The INDU Projects is ready to pay ULC for members who have submitted MOU.

August 28, 2008 2:50 AM


Kishore said...
Hi,
Can some one tell us which G.O. talks, whether a plot/area is under U.L.C

August 28, 2008 7:10 AM


praveen said...
hi all friends
I am T.dakshana Murthy member of Glapalnagar co-operative building society.
As the society commited agreement the MOU is not at all advicable.
Better to conduct a meeting with more builders along with society members so that the problem may be solved amicably.
My opinion is that the agrement should be for 45 to 50% and all expenditure incurred by the developer should be beared by himself.
Threating should be avoided in future.
THANK YOU.
T.Dakshana Murthy
9963312236

August 28, 2008 8:17 AM


raj said...
HI Society Friends
I am M.Shankaraiah member of society bring the following to your notice.
1)The parking area is not at all found.
2)The place for Hospital,School etc are not found.
It is very important point sofar no member has raised about these points.
No development activity or permissions for constuction has not occured since 26 years my sicere advice is that the area should be sold to any IT company or Big firm for a handsome price.
THANKS
M.Shanakaraiah
9866778339

August 28, 2008 8:38 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Plz go to www.ap.gov.in for copy of G.O.'s. U find Govt Orders column on left.And................

Gopal Nagar society says Indu project is ready to pay ULC for the people who sign MOU. Can gopal nagar society put the agreement copy between society and Indu projects where Indu projects committed to pay ULC.At least society agree with me that without all the plot owners giving authority to Indu projects they cannot pay ULC.

Its now a open secret that the plots in Survey No.150/p & 151/p are only under ULC.

I expect our society Secy Suribabu Garu,being fan of our megastar ,Like megastar atleast to put full stop to suspense at this last momment and disclose the plot No.s under ULC.

padma Rao

August 28, 2008 11:41 AM


Comment deleted
This post has been removed by the author.

August 29, 2008 1:31 AM


gopalnagarsociety said...
Please Discard the earlier post done by us. check this one.

APPEAL

To
The Members of Gopal Nagger Co-Operative Hyderabad
House Building Society Ltd. 29.08.2008


Respected Members,

As you are aware of the recent developments of our Society with regard to the issues cropped up concerning to ULC matters and passing of GO No.985 intending to take part of our Society land. In this context some of the persons with vested interest
canvassing and sending mails to our members with false information to misguide and confuse the esteemed members.
You will appreciate that with your support and guidance the Management committee of Society is taking all the steps to safeguard the interest of the members.

Some of our members are under the opinion that our Society land comes under ULC Act of 1976 (Abdul Aziz 7496/1976) .Where as the GO no.985 covers in Sy.Nos 150/P and 151/P .But our Society land comes under Survey Nos 148 to 155 .In order to get the matter clarified we have contacted the officials of ULC and also met the Special Officer. clarifications sought and the response given by them are mentioned as under:


1. Have you done Panchnama and survey?
Ans. Only Survey was done and not Panchnama.

2. Without doing panchnama how can you issue G.O No. 985 and allot to
HUDA ?
Ans No Answer

3 How come the owners of only in Sy.Nos 150 part and 151 part are coming under purview of GO 985 when there was no internal partition of the original land owners when it was sold to the Gopalnagar Society?

Ans No reply

4. The plots under our society have been registered with Sy. Nos. 148 to 155 and lay out has not been approved, How the GO single out the land coming under 150 part and 151 part .
Ans. No convincing reply

5. The Society has not received 8(4) notice, 10(1) notice, 10(3) notice, 10 (5)
notice or 10(6) notice. Why notices were not sent and without sending the
notices can the GO be issued ?
Ans No Answer

The Society is trying to squash the G.O. No. 985 with the support of the
builders and as we have already got the stay on the G.O. 985.

In case of any doubt on any issue pertaining to our Society , you are requested to contact us for necessary clarification and not to be carried away by false propaganda being carried out by some people with vested interests.

With your continued support, we are confident that we will overcome all the hurdles and achieve the desired objectives.


Thanking you Yours sincerely

S.B.S.N.RAJU
(Secretary)

August 29, 2008 3:57 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Respected Suribabu garu,
Thanks for your valuable information.We will be grateful and cautious with the persons who are doing false propogation.I understand from your statement that all the G.O. is wrong and no one need not pay ULC.including society on behalf of the people who signed MOU also.Its a good development as we need not be in hurry to sign Mou i.e. by tomarrow.

What could be our position in case we dont pay ULC and as well in case fail to squash the said G.O. who will be held responsible.

To squash the G.O. we need to have good advocate and not the builder support as you said.

Padma Rao Lakkaraju

August 29, 2008 10:19 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear friends,
Toaday was a good day that Sri Suribabu garu took all the pains to meet me and came all the way to secretariat in the interest of the society.
He was with a very open mind and offered a great opportunity to the people.
if they can get a reputed builder who can take up development of the society plots and can give more than 10sft per yard.

He promised to give all the facts about society by tomarrow so that we can try to get a better deal. I am on the job.suggestions welcome

Padma Rao Lakkaraju

August 29, 2008 10:28 AM


Lakshman said...
So what is the final suggestion for members ?

1. No need to pay individually or
2. No need to pay ULC for Gopalnagar society ?

If 2 is correct , then why society asked members to submit the ULC application forms and signed MOUs and said developer will pay for ULC on behalf of members ?

Is this not false/misguiding members ?

Request you to convey the proper message and not club ULC issue with Development. Members are totally confusing...

August 29, 2008 10:55 AM


Lakshman said...
If anybody pay for ULC or submitted the application form at society..

Can you please clarify the item(6 (a) ) in the ULC application form? what is 8(4), anybody have this document/information?

Also can you provide the link for GO.985 and 747 where we can get the documents online?

August 29, 2008 11:01 AM


Dharma Rao said...
First thanks to Suribabu garu and as well as Padma Rao for posting the details

My suggestions are below mentioned.

1) We can ask for 13 to 15 SFT per SQ yard
2) Number of floors should be limited to 10 to 12
3) Number of flats should be limited to approximately 80 per acre, excluding common facilities area.
4) If builder constructs all apartments in entire society , it will be good
5) Otherwise (we don’t bother about their share of open land), if atleast they need to follow first 3 conditions

August 29, 2008 11:14 AM


INDU said...
Thank you Padma Rao Garu for spending your valuable time for us .

Also our thanks to Suribabu garu for cooperating you in this regard.

In general we do get 50:50 in developments.

As we have more plotting in our layout let us demand INDU/any other Builder atleast 40% share (if possible 45%).

August 29, 2008 12:51 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Lakshman Garu,If there is any correct answer regarding ULC,only society can answer ur question.

Dharma Rao & Indu Garu,We will try to get best bargain

Padma Rao
9392293939

August 29, 2008 10:29 PM


vasu said...
hi this is vasu; i am having a plot in gopal nagar society and it is under ULC as per the GO. i got clear information from ULC officials. i am paying ULC payment individually. i took the advises from experts and took this decission. 30th of august is last date for application. but they will accept application on 31st also if DD is with date of 30th of august.

thank you
vasu

August 29, 2008 11:17 PM


Lakshman said...
Thanks Vasu,

We thought today only we have to submit the applications.

We have group of 50 people. We are also paying invidually as Scoiety is not providing any suggestions for members. Among 50 some already paid and we are going to submit applications today/tomorrow.

Btw, how is crowd there in ULC office ?

August 30, 2008 1:06 AM


Raj said...
I once again suggest my friends to give their contact details. can society tell has indu projets paid for ULC?

What benefit the people got who signed MOU till date and what loss for the people who hav not signed?

August 30, 2008 3:21 AM


Kishore said...
Friends wake up... with out investing single penny on the land builder will be getting NET PROFIT of Rs. 5000 CRORES on 50 acres land.
Pls refer below, for maths..

1) My friend bought the plot for Rs.15000 per Square Yard a 2 months back.
2) So, as per the society there are 1200 plots. So the market rate of the land stands as of now, 540 crores (Not a joke. It is five hundred fifty crores).
3) Just imazine, if they construct 14 story buildings in 50 acreas (leaving the rest of 43 acres for roads and other facilities), the salable are comes around 21 lakhs 60 thousand sft per flore (6 sft constructed area per square yard).
4) If we assume the Rs. 3000 per sft, property value becomes around 700 crores per flore.
5) If they construct 14 flores the property per 50 acres would be around 9000 crores.
6) Lets assume, Rs. 1000 per sft construction cost, then the construction cost comes around 3000 crores.
7) If you take awy 3000 crores from 9000 crores the profit comes around 6000 Crores.
8) Lets take away the owners share of 10 sft per square yard (1200 plots multiplied by 3000 sft multiplied by Rs. 1000 per sft construction cost) it comes around Rs. 400 crores.
9) Finaly, the builder get a NET PROFIT OF around Rs.5000 Crores.



I don't think MOU will bound us in any way. We still have fair chances to bargain the "salable area" with Indu. I think the game has not started yet. We should demand for more.

August 30, 2008 5:34 AM


Surya said...
An open letter to Sri.Padma Rao

First let me introduce my self as Surya Narayana, owner of plot no.185 in the society and attending regularly all the meetings being a responsible member participating in the discussions and a party to the resolutions passed thereon.

I saw your mails today and I am perturbed to note as to how you are misguiding the gullible members with your half-baked knowledge about the society affairs. To substantiate my view point ,I mention the following few points for the information of the concerned:

1.Who are you? Are you a registered owner of the society? Whether the plot is in your name?

2 Where were you all these years? How many meetings you have attended in the preceding 7 years?

3. Do you know that in these years the Society regularly conducts the meetings and sizeable number of members participate and resolutions are passed in a democratic way?

4 Do you also know that the issue of giving the land to a Builder was discussed in a good number of meetings and after taking into account of all the merits and demerits the members passed a resolution to give it to the Builder?

5. Are you also aware that in the meetings, respected members were requested to bring any builder with better terms and conditions for benefit of all the plot owners and nobody came forward ?

6 Do you know that 4 to 5 reputed builders were approached and after knowing the draw backs (pending court cases, excess plotted area, land nearer to railway track and pipeline road in which a sizeable number of plot owners are likely to lose their plots)Offered lesser floor area than M/s. Indu projects offered?

6.Do you know that with the approval of the members a Core Committee was formed to negotiate with the builder for getting more benefit to the members and the Committee held series of discussions with the builder?

7. Do you also aware that after considering all the pros and cons of the issue of giving the land to the developer, the General Body passed the resolution to give it to the Builder?

8.Are you also aware that around 80 to 90% of the members gave their consent to go ahead with the proposal and accordingly signed the MOUs?
9.Do you know that when it was decided to develop the land by the society itself by collecting the Development Money from the members and how many members till date have not even paid their 1 st instalment?

10.Do you know how many genuine owners are in trouble due to the registrations taking place with fake documents?

The above questions are only a tip of an iceberg to know your sincerity and intentions in view of your entry into the last episode of this mega serial.

Now coming to the tone and tenor used by you in the mails particularly
1.Describing the meeting with a comedy show
2.Saracastic remarks on Sri.Suri Babu, the General Secretary of the Society describing him as fan of Mega star Chiranjeevi speaks volumes of your arrogance and disrespect to the society affairs.

You have to without any loss of time unconditionally tender apology for your misbehavior otherwise you do not have any moral right to criticize the ongoing activities of the society and you will be dealt with accordingly by the members .

Do you think 900 members already signed the MOUs and many are likely to sign are fools and be misled by your concocted stories and promises you are making ?

We are all aware that some people with their vested interests are trying to somehow through their mean tactics hoping that this deal did not come true. I am surprised and fail to evaluate your role in this. If you are really sincere and want to become a Champion to take care of the interests of the members who have put their hard earned money in this venture, please come forward with an undertaking to all the members that you will bring another builder with improved facilities and floor area.

Finally how come the General Secretary authorized you to bring a builder at this stage even without any sort of undertaking/ Guarantee from you for a better deal? To my mind this is only a dirty trick you are playing to some how prolong the process and lose the opportunity, which is in our hands.

Suppose if you bring a builder with better benefits ( in all like hood this will not happen and you will disappear from the scene as your conduct itself proves that you have not even attended one meeting) and subsequently another champion like you again enter the scene and gives a false promise that he will bring another builder with better facilities. Then what would be the our stand . Time is running out. These are all time killing tactics and it is always wise that A BIRD IN HAND IS BETER THAN TWO IN BUSH.
Hence you please come out with concrete assurances to prove your sincerity in helping the gullible members some of them have already been misled by your sweet-coated pills.

And finally please remember that in a democratic society things happen with majority voice and there will always be some opposition in one form or the other. When we are at a crucial junction after crossing many hurdles in these long 27 years and hoping to see the light in the tunnel ,I hope you will not wish your name be written in the history of Gopalnagar Housing Society with whose active role spoiled the final outcome and be cursed by the poor members.

Hope you take all the above in right perspective and only do good to the society.

With best wishes.

August 30, 2008 5:50 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Reply to An open letter to Sri.Padma Rao by Sri. Surya Narayana.

1Q. First let me introduce my self as Surya Narayana, owner of plot no.185 in the society and attending regularly all the meetings being a responsible member participating in the discussions and a party to the resolutions passed thereon.
Ans.I appreciate you

2Q.I saw your mails today and I am perturbed to note as to how you are misguiding the gullible members with your half-baked knowledge about the society affairs. To substantiate my view point ,I mention the following few points for the information of the concerned:
Ans. You are such an active person. How come you delayed so much in going thru my mails, is surprising. Any how Please dont get perturbed as our members are not fools to believe us in case either you or me or someone misguides .

1.Who are you? Are you a registered owner of the society? Whether the plot is in your name?
A)I am a law practitioner in Hon'ble High court of A.P. my blood relation is the owner. I think that should be sufficient to protect our interests.

2 Where were you all these years? How many meetings you have attended in the preceding 7 years?
A)I dont have the numbers. From this time I will make a note.

3. Do you know that in these years the Society regularly conducts the meetings and sizeable number of members participate and resolutions are passed in a democratic way?
A) Yes I know (Request you for the definition of Democratic Way)

4 Do you also know that the issue of giving the land to a Builder was discussed in a good number of meetings and after taking into account of all the merits and demerits the members passed a resolution to give it to the Builder?
A) Yes I am Aware.

5. Are you also aware that in the meetings, respected members were requested to bring any builder with better terms and conditions for benefit of all the plot owners and nobody came forward ?
A) Yes I know. I hope it does not mean that we should agree to a bad proposal as no one is coming forward.

6 Do you know that 4 to 5 reputed builders were approached and after knowing the draw backs (pending court cases, excess plotted area, land nearer to railway track and pipeline road in which a sizeable number of plot owners are likely to lose their plots)Offered lesser floor area than M/s. Indu projects offered?
A) Yes I know. Even we were informed that L&T was prepared to give for 17 Sq.ft /Sq.Yard and Indu for 10Sq.Ft/Sq.Yard

6.Do you know that with the approval of the members a Core Committee was formed to negotiate with the builder for getting more benefit to the members and the Committee held series of discussions with the builder?
A) What was discussed I dont know.

7. Do you also aware that after considering all the pros and cons of the issue of giving the land to the developer, the General Body passed the resolution to give it to the Builder?
A) May I know for which builder

8.Are you also aware that around 80 to 90% of the members gave their consent to go ahead with the proposal and accordingly signed the MOUs?
A) I congratulate you as 80 to 90 % signed. Hope you could have given exact detail of those people which could have encouraged others also to join. I hope you agree with me saying a variance of 80% to 90% (i.e) 10% is quite big.

9.Do you know that when it was decided to develop the land by the society itself by collecting the Development Money from the members and how many members till date have not even paid their 1 st instalment?
A. Along with me ,Many dont know. Kindly display the list in WEB and even list of people who signed MOU.

10.Do you know how many genuine owners are in trouble due to the registrations taking place with fake documents?
A.Along with me ,Many dont know. Kindly display the list in WEB .Who made those registrations with Fake documents?

11.The above questions are only a tip of an iceberg to know your sincerity and intentions in view of your entry into the last episode of this mega serial.
A. Let the people see the entire ice berg. I dont know what made you to conclude this as last episode.

12.Now coming to the tone and tenor used by you in the mails particularly
1.Describing the meeting with a comedy show.
A.I felt. If it hurt some one I with draw that comment.

2.Saracastic remarks on Sri.Suri Babu, the General Secretary of the Society describing him as fan of Mega star Chiranjeevi speaks volumes of your arrogance and disrespect to the society affairs.
A. If it hurt some one I with draw that comment. I heard from many members that he is .I even don’t know that any comment on Sri.SuriBabu is as good as on society affairs.i.e.Society is Sri.SuriBabu and SuriBabu is Society.

3.You have to without any loss of time unconditionally tender apology for your misbehavior otherwise you do not have any moral right to criticize the ongoing activities of the society.
A) If I tender apology , will I have the right to criticize the ongoing activities of society?
4) you will be dealt with accordingly by the members .
A) Are you threatening me? You may proceed.

5)Do you think 900 members already signed the MOUs and many are likely to sign are fools and be misled by your concocted stories and promises you are making ?
A) I also want to confirm you that members are not fools. Let me know what promises I made.

6)We are all aware that some people with their vested interests are trying to somehow through their mean tactics hoping that this deal did not come true. I am surprised and fail to evaluate your role in this. If you are really sincere and want to become a Champion to take care of the interests of the members who have put their hard earned money in this venture, please come forward with an undertaking to all the members that you will bring another builder with improved facilities and floor area.
A)We are all aware that some people with their vested interests are trying to somehow through their mean tactics hoping that this deal did not come true. I am surprised and fail to evaluate your role in this. If you are really sincere and want to become a Champion to take care of the interests of the members who have put their hard earned money in this venture, please come forward with an undertaking to all the members that you will bring every thing in order.


7) Finally how come the General Secretary authorized you to bring a builder at this stage even without any sort of undertaking/ Guarantee from you for a better deal? To my mind this is only a dirty trick you are playing to some how prolong the process and lose the opportunity, which is in our hands.
A)Let the general secretary say that he has not met me yesterday and not agreed that he will welcome any one who comes with a better deal. Your above question can be better answered by the General Secretary. If this is really a great matchless opportunity, and if its lost I am also a victim along with others.

8)Suppose if you bring a builder with better benefits ( in all like hood this will not happen and you will disappear from the scene as your conduct itself proves that you have not even attended one meeting) and subsequently another champion like you again enter the scene and gives a false promise that he will bring another builder with better facilities. Then what would be the our stand . Time is running out.
A)I hope you are also a beneficiary in case we strike a better deal. Are You NOT?I am very conscious about time.I requested the general secretary yesterday when we met that, to list out all the difficulties we are facing on a paper and not orally. We will approach some reputed builder with these difficulties and ask if he can give a better offer and can finalize the builder within a time frame of one month. He promised to fax those details by today noon. I have not yet received .
9)These are all time killing tactics and it is always wise that A BIRD IN HAND IS BETER THAN TWO IN BUSH.
A) can you give one good reason, why some one would like to kill time?

10)Hence you please come out with concrete assurances to prove your sincerity in helping the gullible members some of them have already been misled by your sweet-coated pills.
A)Let me know what reasonable assurances I can give? I thank you for making me toknow that I can influence some people by my writings. I am not here to mislead or to get misled.

11)And finally please remember that in a democratic society things happen with majority voice and there will always be some opposition in one form or the other.
A)I agree. Hope 50% + agreeing is not final
12)When we are at a crucial junction after crossing many hurdles in these long 27 years and hoping to see the light in the tunnel ,I hope you will not wish your name be written in the history of Gopalnagar Housing Society with whose active role spoiled the final outcome and be cursed by the poor members.
A)Time will speak about it.

13)Hope you take all the above in right perspective and only do good to the society.
A)Yes Very much.

14)With best wishes.
A) Thanks .I wish the Same
Padma rao

August 30, 2008 2:04 PM


vasu said...
Good new to survey nos: 150 and 151plot owners in Gopal nagar society that govt has extend the last date of ULC applications to 30th of september. so make arrangements individually to pay the ULC payment.

I am very thankful to sri padma rao garu towards providing needful information to safe gaurd the members benfit.


thank you
vasu

August 30, 2008 6:49 PM


Lakshman said...
I support Padma Rao garu.

He asked two valid questions:

1. Lit out 80% who has signed MOU on WEB.

Requesting society to publish and be transperant with members instead of telling..

2. Lit out 80% who has registered with fake documents.

Requesting society to publish the list in the site.

Request Mr. Surya please take lead for this activity if you are well wisher for the members.

Thanks...

August 30, 2008 10:08 PM


krish said...
Dear members,
On reading the mail of Sri.Surya and the reply of Sri.Padma rao garu, the following are observed :
1.The plot is not in his (padma rao) name and may his distant relative name.
2.He has no courage to admit that he has not attended any meetings.
3.The statement of only 50%+ signed the MOUs speaks that he is not fully aware.I know that the figure is above 80%
4.Sri. Rao said that L&T offered 17sft.If it is true I request rao to speak to them and we all can congratulate him if he can use his contacts in getting L&T which is a reputed firm.He should finish the deal within a time frame of say 10 days. Earliar many were requested to bring builders, but to my notice nobody came forward knowing the problems of our society.
He should go to the Society office and find out the facts and should not expect secretary should meet him.
lastly it is good that Sri.Rao realised his mistake by withdrawing th remarks.

Narender

August 30, 2008 10:31 PM


Kishore said...
I appreciate and support Mr. Padma Rao. I liked his answer to question number 8 of Mr. Surya.

8)Suppose if you bring a builder with better benefits ( in all like hood this will not happen and you will disappear from the scene as your conduct itself proves that you have not even attended one meeting) and subsequently another champion like you again enter the scene and gives a false promise that he will bring another builder with better facilities. Then what would be the our stand . Time is running out.
A)I hope you are also a beneficiary in case we strike a better deal. Are You NOT?I am very conscious about time.I requested the general secretary yesterday when we met that, to list out all the difficulties we are facing on a paper and not orally. We will approach some reputed builder with these difficulties and ask if he can give a better offer and can finalize the builder within a time frame of one month. He promised to fax those details by today noon. I have not yet received .
9)These are all time killing tactics and it is always wise that A BIRD IN HAND IS BETER THAN TWO IN BUSH.
A) can you give one good reason, why some one would like to kill time?

August 31, 2008 6:58 AM


muralivyshu said...
hello friends,
actually the situation everybody knows,near the sorrounding of our land every builder is ready to give 50% and as well as some financial benfit but we r loosing both.10 sq feet per yard is very less and some of the people accepting this but it is not correct enquire the situations in the market.so many problems is in our society suribabu said so we have to sacrifice to loose some of the benfits, everybody accept it but here shows not looking like that
we r loosing lot of benfits.one example iam giving
NALANDA society, it is very near to the allwyn colony & miyapur. the society given for developement they r getting 18 sqft/yard and financial benfit 1000 per yard (goodwill) already work is started sairam builders taken this project.
Here society people think once again and try to get more benfit to us.please persue the same and go for better bargain.
1.please convey message through net actually who r under ULC and who r not.
2.what r the problems we r facing please provide in this blog so everybody knows.
3.society should think,everybody shold get good benfit (plot owner,society and builder).Here i observed builder getting more than us.
padmarao raise some questions we think answers for that dont agitate,why dont we take in positive way,we r waited so many long years we wait some more time for getting good results.
please give answers for blog questions.
Thank u all

August 31, 2008 10:07 AM


Satish said...
I really appreciate Mr. Padma Rao Garu for spending your valuable time for everyone’s benefit and also Thanks to Suribabu Garu and society core member who are “sincerely” working behalf of all members.

I support Mr. Padma Rao Garu on his stand on MOU.

The deal with INDU projects is not yet all acceptable I’m not going to sign present MOU unless until get better deal and more clarity of the construction plan.

I request Mr Suribabu Garu and core members instead of saying lot of problems lot of problems every time orally LIST OUT ALL PROBLEM and make it available to all members. I really appreciate if you post on this blog.

ULC GO issued on Feb 8th, till today why Society is not given clear picture to the members who are really getting effected as per ULC. ULS says about 15+ acres of land will be taken over, that means roughly 150 plots ( 300 Sq yard ) will get effect. Showing this as a big problem Society pushing everyone to sign the MOU.

Please list all out all members who accepted MOU and pending people. Please don’t give rough %.

Please list out all proposals so far received.

August 31, 2008 1:06 PM


vasu said...
there is no right to force the members to sign on MOU. they have to leave the options like:

a) willing to sign on MOU.
b) willing to shift the plot to other location in venture.
c) willing to sell at decided price as per current market value.

otherwise it is not posible to get 100% positive on their proposal. society must list out the plot owners who are already signed on MOU. now already clear that some part of land(survey no: 150p and 151p) is in ULC. rest of the land is clear. so they may not come forward to sign on MOU(except who is loosing the plots near to railway track) and they may form another group i.e anti society group. it is not good in one society. so please take necessary steps to set right the issue.

thank you
vasu

August 31, 2008 9:20 PM


Kishore said...
I support Padmarao and others who are pushing to have better deal.

Since the ULC date has been postponed, I think this is the time to renegotiate the MOU with INDU. Or invite other builders.

September 1, 2008 1:41 AM


Lakshman said...
Request society body and Suribabu garu

Sir we have one month time so please publish the correct details on ULC land in our society with plot numbers and owner contact details. Hope you must have all these details in your hand already.

GO.747 has released on 18-Jun-2008 but society did not publish the details whether our land is in ULC or not.

We had meeting on 20-July-2008 but in that meeting did not talk on ULC as every one feels that our LAND is not in ULC.

We wokeup in the last minute after 02-08-2008 GO.985 released.

Once ULC issue is cleared we can think of development activity.

Request you to please please help the members in knowing the details of ULC clearly. Don't club ULC with development activity.

And also society suggestion to ULC plot owners to pay individually or any other option.

September 1, 2008 6:39 PM


ప్రసాద్ said...
Some of the Surya's arrogative comments on Padma Rao are not acceptable.

A person not necessarily a member of the society or plot owner to question the society's questionable behaviour. I am the plot owner but I never had an apportunity to attend society meeting. Reasons are many..society not informing in advance with ample time with meeting dates and objectives. Also many owners are scattered all over the state if not the country and even abroad.

Also I challenge the society to publish the member details who have signed the MOU till now. Also publish the plot numbers that come under the GO 985. This is a technical age and we, all the membrs can have meaningful dialogue thru blogs and opinion polls etc. So please utilize the media.
If the society is transperant enough there is no need for Padma Rao or Someone else appearance here.. If we members have to blame.. we have to blame society. Atleat now come with the numbers and tell us who sighned MOU.

--Prasad
#http://blog.charasala.com

September 1, 2008 8:34 PM


suresh said...
one says these are the plot numbers:

56 to 73,413,414,433,453 to 484 ,503 to 532,551 to 580, 599,606,607,608,609,622 to 628,824 to 832 in survey no 150 and 151.

some other person says these are the plot numbers:

The plot numbers covered under this are all 433/xx and some 5xx series numbers.

any idea which one is correct ?.

September 1, 2008 9:02 PM


sgarlap said...
Dear Vasu,
Understood from your post that you were able to pay the ULC fee. Sorry I am very new to this and am trying to understand what this all means. Would paying the ULC fee clear the plot from HUDA takeover? If so, can you please provide some pointers on the process for making this payment. I live outside India and am trying to figure this process out. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Sri

September 1, 2008 9:06 PM


suresh said...
Vasu gaaru,
I live outside india. i am also interested to pay the ULC amount.

can you please give us some pointers on "how to pay". Also how much we need to pay ?.

September 1, 2008 9:15 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
In the first instance I need not answer any of the questions raised by Sri.Suryanarayana.If I don’t answer ,as it may give an impression to the members (Not Sri.Surya narayana) that I don’t have answers,so I replied.I asked some questions to Sri Surya wchich he dint reply,and I expected he will not.
Later another member raised some silly questions, I don’t think they are worth answering in light of reply to Sri.Surya’s letter.For instance Sri Surya questioned me how come the Secretary authorized me to get a better deal (For which Secretary doesn’t respond) on the other hand this member gives me a week time to get a deal if I can. Leave those controversies
My sincere request is let these Surya and others in the interest of society may answer and guide all the members which were asked long back for the questions like
All the problems the society facing as on date on WEB and your mitigation plan.
I understand from your statement that all the G.O. is wrong and no one need not pay ULC.including society on behalf of the people who signed MOU also.Its a good development as we need not be in hurry to sign Mou i.e. by tomarrow.

What could be our position in case we dont pay ULC and as well in case fail to squash the said G.O. who will be held responsible.

To squash the G.O. we need to have good advocate and not the builder support as you said
By Padma Rao
What benefit the people got who signed MOU till date and what loss for the people who hav not signed?
By RAJ

In general we do get 50:50 in developments.

As we have more plotting in our layout let us demand INDU/any other Builder atleast 40% share (if possible 45%
By Indu
So what is the final suggestion for members ?

1. No need to pay individually or
2. No need to pay ULC for Gopalnagar society ?

If 2 is correct , then why society asked members to submit the ULC application forms and signed MOUs and said developer will pay for ULC on behalf of members ?

Is this not false/misguiding members ?

Request you to convey the proper message and not club ULC issue with Development. Members are totally confusing...
By Lakshman

ETC.............................................................

September 1, 2008 11:10 PM


Raj said...
Has Indu projects or Society paid any ULC?

September 1, 2008 11:19 PM


Lakshman said...
Dear Suresh,

Please send your mail id we will send the details as we can't attach files here.

September 1, 2008 11:22 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Its difficult to explain about ULC in a nut shell.But its good that u Pay ULC.U will be on safer side.The money is with GOVT and in case if we dont come under its purview,the amount is returned.Refarding amount to be paid it varies from case to case depending on the date of registration and area of plot

Padma Rao
9392293939

September 1, 2008 11:29 PM


Lakshman said...
Suresh,

go to www.ap.gov.in

Click on Govt orders from leftside panel.

Select "REVENUE" from 1st dropdown box

Select "ULC-1" from 2nd dropdown box

Select "MS" from 3rd dropdown box.

Then click submit, you will get list of Govs, among them download GO.747 and Go.985.

GO.747 has application form and pay details etc.

September 1, 2008 11:50 PM


INDU said...
Why more than 80% have signed on MOU is society (Mr. Suribabu) said that it is just to show the Builder (INDU or any other builder) that we are ready to go for Development.

Also Mr. Suribabu told that INDU is asking for 800+ MOU applications. Once we get 800+ MOUs we can demand for more SFT per yard.

Because of that only so many people signed on MOU. But in general body meetings same persons who signed on MOU are against for the INDU proposal.

September 2, 2008 12:08 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Suresh,
Please apply thru Right to information act for the plots under ULC.They are responding immediately.that will be very much authenticated

Padma Rao

September 2, 2008 1:13 PM


Kishore said...
RTI (Right To Information) procedure:

1. What is the Application Procedure for requesting information?
Apply in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area, to the PIO, specifying the particulars of the information sought for.
Reason for seeking information are not required to be given;
Pay fees as may be prescribed (if not belonging to the below poverty line category).


2. What is the time limit to get the information?
30 days from the date of application
48 hours for information concerning the life and liberty of a person
5 days shall be added to the above response time, in case the application for information is given to Assistant Public Information Officer.
If the interests of a third party are involved then time limit will be 40 days (maximum period + time given to the party to make representation).
Failure to provide information within the specified period is a deemed refusal.


3. What is the fee?
Application fees to be prescribed which must be reasonable.
If further fees are required, then the same must be intimated in writing with calculation details of how the figure was arrived at;
Applicant can seek review of the decision on fees charged by the PIO by applying to the appropriate Appellate Authority;
No fees will be charged from people living below the poverty line
Applicant must be provided information free of cost if the PIO fails to comply with the prescribed time limit.


4. What could be the ground for rejection?
If it is covered by exemption from disclosure. (S.8)
If it infringes copyright of any person other than the State. (S.9)

September 3, 2008 2:44 AM


Kishore said...
You an also get the required info from below web site

http://rti.gov.in/

September 3, 2008 2:50 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Kishore,Lakshman & Vasu,

If 5 people like you actively participate,we can really do substantially good to society.I really appreciate your proactiveness.Can I have ur numbers r can u give me a ring.In case of ULC RTI people are giving info in week time.

Padma Rao
9392293939

September 3, 2008 12:21 PM


vasu said...
respected padma rao garu i am sending you my email id
srmunna72@gmail.com
along with me nearly 20 members (friends) are not yet signed on MOU. we dont want to do that mistake.

thank you
vasu

September 3, 2008 8:59 PM


Kishore said...
PadmaRao garu,

My email-id is kishore.reddycv@gmail.com

reddybpk@yahoo.com (other plot owner)

I will give you ring today along with my other US friends. I will set upa Conferance call with you.

Probably 7:00pm IST.

Kishore

September 4, 2008 1:54 AM


Pr Reddy said...
Hello all,

We need a win-win situation between developers and plots owners. The onus of creating this is on society since they are in the middle and also on developers. Infact society should act in the favour of landlords since it is a body represents landlords. I request society to reveal the happenings between developer and society. Everyone should understand the era of uneducated communication has been diminished and please remove from your minds the members can be decieved easily.

I request all parties to stay on common ground and assess the risk factors in calling other builders for development and advantages/disadvantages by going through Ms.Indu developers. I think there are some distractions by fingerpointing each other.It could be a deliberate action to mislead actual issue and it is unfair to target and inhibit a person who ask for rights.
Our goal is to get a better deal and should benefit all the parties.

I request society to send weekly meeting minutes to every memeber who provided email addresses.

I am available for all the open communication please feel free to send me email @ reddybpk@gmail.com

September 4, 2008 7:00 AM


Satish said...
Mr Suribabu Garu & society core group members, many people are requesting information about
1. current issues.
2. Plot numbers under ULC
3. Number of people signed MOU.
Till today there is no comment from you guys. If you guys don’t provide info nothing is going to go forward. U have to conduct another meeting with all members so that people can chose whatever they want. Please I request you don't wait till Sep end. (ULC deadline Sep 30.)

Appreciate you cooperation.


Thanks
Satish

September 4, 2008 9:04 AM


jaya said...
Hi Friends,
First of all, comments against Sri Padma Rao garu are not acceptable to me also and I advise Sri Padma Rao garu to ignore such type of comments, as Prasad (Charasala) said. Plot owners who are in trouble might go ahead with the proposed deal with Indu. Why should other plot owners suffer? If people like Padma Rao garu fetch better deal than Indu, everybody will be at benefit. 10 sqft per sq. yard is way below than market standards. I don't understand why Society is not giving information that memebers were asking is a big surprise to me (such as plot numbers under ULC, signed members info, problems that the society is facing).

September 4, 2008 10:44 AM


rsak05 said...
To be safe side, regardless whether you sign MOU or not, filing ULC by the individuals is a good idea so that you are covered from ULC point of view. Just a thought..

September 4, 2008 1:23 PM


gopalnagarsociety said...
To

Renuka,
Kumar,
Arun kulkarni,
Venkat,
Jagadish,
Padma Rao L,
Murthi Cheruvu,
Dharma Rao,
Kishore,
Satya,
Annu,
Dr.Jayaram,
Indu,
Raj,
Lakshman,
Raja Parakala,
Dakshina Murthy,
Murali vyshu,
Satish,
Vasu,
Pr Reddy ,
Jaya.

We request all the members to come to the Society Office to clarify their doubts and issues as we can't explain everything on the blog because any outside people can have a watch at our details. so we request to come together to the office and have the details.
Hope everyone will understand how critical the situation is.

Thank you

Secretary

September 5, 2008 1:19 AM


gopalnagarsociety said...
if anyone is unable to come to the office, please send someone on your behalf for the details.

Thank you

September 5, 2008 1:22 AM


vasu said...
I have already paid the ULC amount. so i need not bother about ULC. i will leave it like that. i will get the clearance from the govt. society is not giving correct information to members.i called to society office twice regarding ULC. they asked me to come to society office to sign on MOU. what is the necessary to force the members to sign on MOU by getting that much of less share.you send all the problems on our land to members,if you feel that 'the outside people may have details' instead post in blog.

thank you
vasu

September 5, 2008 3:11 AM


Lakshman said...
What is secret and whatelse other can know about our society?

Every one knows and waiting for the fruite in terms of land.

I am in abroad and can not comedown to office and can not spend time for no output discussion.

I request society to publish all the details in terms of ULC plots and signed MOUs

Only 26 days remaining so I request Suribabu garu please take necessary actions interms of ULC first. Once ULC cleared then we can think about development.

September 5, 2008 10:08 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Sri SuriBabu garu,
Is there anything new that can be discussed in case I come to your office to that of discussed earlier?
If you have answer plz let us know.

1.U said people need to Sign Mou before 30th of Aug as Indu Projects will pay ULC.Have they paid?

2. What interest others will have to know secrets of our society?

3.So many people are asking you to list out the problems the society is facing.In case confidential As Vasu garu said send by post.

4.I too have paid ULC.Now I am planning to apply for construction of my house in my plot.Any one has any objection?

Padma Rao

September 5, 2008 10:53 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Friends,

We should all thank Sri.SuriBabu for inviting ALL OF US to his office,But I felt bad regarding only one thing.
He did not invite SRI.SURYA & SRI.NARENDER,WHO WERE OPPOSSING ME VERY MUCH.SURIBABU GARU REALLY I WAS NOT HURT WITH THEIR POSTINGS,YOU MAY INVITE THEM ALSO .

PADMARAO

September 5, 2008 11:09 AM


Lakshman said...
Hi PadmaRao garu,

My self and my friends ( 4 ) already applied for ULC on 31st August. Another group is about to paying..

Can you please let me know how to apply for house permission. we are infact waiting for that good chance only.

One more thing we already paid for layout regulization as well. so we hope we don't have any problem in getting permission.

Hope Govt will provide current on our long poles which are waiting since 2 years.

Anybody applied for layout regulaization as well ?

Hope we are getting good days in the near future. ( Like to remember one song in Sri Ramadasu, naa edamakannu aduruchunnadi, naa ramuniki machni gadiyalu vastunnatu... )

Hope Mr. Suri babu garu will help us in this regard as well.

September 5, 2008 11:44 AM


peopleofgopalnagarsociety said...
Dear Secretary,

I do not see any point in coming to the meeting any more, the reason being, ever time I come there all you will say is sign MOU, sign MOU and if some one asks about our own development you cross question them, so I am not coming to the meeting unless you publish the meeting agenda of what we are going to discuss. I have couple of friends and relatives who also purchased there and did not sign MOU, so dont tell me 80% already signed MOU, which I know is not true.

I along with my friends paid for ULC. so we are not in a hurry.

As every one else, my only intention of buying that land is to construct my small DREAM HOME, I am not saying I am against development if every one is ok then I also do not have any objection, but not for Indu, that is for sure, as I stated in my previous comments they(Indu people and all the parties involved in this deal) are cheating society members in almost every way, so I do not want that deal at any cost.

If the society people are so sincier why dont you they fulfill all the promises they made?
as our elders say - what is the point in blowing a horn infront of a deaf person?

Even though every one is asking, society people did not even respond to our request to post ULC details which shows how sincier they are.

September 5, 2008 3:19 PM


Comment deleted
This post has been removed by the author.

September 5, 2008 4:45 PM


Sasidhara said...
To Secretary,


I have plot in Gopal nagar society and I live in USA.
I have not yet signed MOU ( I know some members who did not signed) and I have been following all the meetings thru one of my friend. I have a feeling like everybody else, that society is forcing us to sign on MOU which does not fetch much.

As Padmarao garu, Lakshman garu and all other members repeatedly asking, why can’t you reveal what issues we are facing and what are the plots come under ULC. It really helps everybody to understand the issues.
If you think it is a problem to publish on net, you can send to our mail id’s as Lakshman garu said, since it is difficult for all members to attend the meeting.

To Padmarao garu, Lakshman garu and all members,

All of you guys paid Lay out regularization?
I did neither pay for regularization nor ULC. I am going to pay for ULC by end of this month.
1) Do we need to pay for Lay out regularization? If so Can I pay for lay out regularization along with ULC?
2) How much it would be for Lay out regularization and ULC?

If you could let me know, I would appreciate it.
In case if you want to contact me on my personal mail id, Here is my mail ID:manthena.varma@gmail.com


Thank you,
Sasi.

September 5, 2008 4:50 PM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Friends,

We are all in a confusion state and slowly people are coming out with clarity now.

There is sort of suspicion and fear among some people ,that some may be black sheeps.

what ever it is now I feel the time has come for a open discussion.

Lakshman garu,
you are very safe from Govt point of view as you have paid ULC and as well layout regularization.There are so many like you who did this but dont want to disclose. I dont say 80%.

So many of such people are in touch with me, and after 30th September, we all as a group are going to apply for construction,it is advisable that you may also join.

Sasi Garu,

How much it would be for Lay out regularization and ULC?
As I already said it caries from case to case from 78,000/- to 2,00,000/- for the 300 sq yds,more old is the registration less amount

PadmaRao
9392293939

September 5, 2008 10:31 PM


krish said...
Dear Members,
I welcome the invitation of the society in asking the members who are making comments here to come to the office for getting the doubts clarified. why do not these members go ? It appears that they do not have time to attend the meetings and give their suggestions . Then how the society will proceed further. Will they ignore the resolutions passed with the majority of the members consent.
Now one of the members says he will construct the house amd who will provide the basic amenities like power, water , drainage, roads , layout approval when members did not pay the development charges when the society wanteted to develop. This is the history of the society.That is why members decided to give it to a builder.
What happened to Sri.Padmarao's efforts in bringing a builder with better floor area

So friends do not be carried away by these messages.
So go to the society office for getting your doubts claried

Regards.
Krishna

September 6, 2008 12:55 AM


vasu said...
Only becouse of silly reasons like roads, drainage and power how can we loose the current market benefits. purely society is pro to indu. they are not supporting to members. without roads drainage and water our east border gokul plots owner are constructing multi staired buildings. there is no permissions to them. how it is make them posible. why not we? we have idividual registrations and clear titles. If we come to ULC, it is good to all. becouse till before issuing the GO MS no 985 all are in confussion why becouse we dont know which one is under ULC. now there is no confussion on ULC.
Instead of forcing to sign on MOU, society must be concentrate on collecting the development charges and use them on compleating the power, drainage and other works.

thanks vasu

September 6, 2008 6:39 AM


Ajay said...
Dear Society Members,Society and Against MOU

I kindly request all u people to get together, talk and conclude this issue. Please do not form groups and prolong this till 2020. How long will this continue?

Either we go for builder or construct our own house b4 some one like govt look in this and create a new rule and take our lands.

If u all say builders, then find the best in the market and u all frame and give terms and conditions b4 they give us. Calculate for the best profit, according to that write the agreement. Let all of us enjoy the benefit.

If everyone agrees to build their own house its fine. But first of all we should develop our society land like road, electricity ,water and drainage. For this all the members should raise their hands to do so.

This is not a small thing as u all know, that society was trying to develop the society land for the past so many years. Few people pay money for development, few people may not. Moreover there are few members who cannot afford to construct their own houses.

In this process few members may loose their lands, so think accordingly. By keeping these thing in your mind please take a good decision and conclude it as soon as possible.

Ajay

September 6, 2008 7:55 AM


against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...
Dear Krish,

First let me know ur krishna or Narender or krishna alias Narender?We are understanding every thing may be slowly.U said some people paid full/partial/nil development charges.Can u give details?Are you going to return the money in case it is given to developers?Regarding myself getting a builder with better offer,I once again like to answer for your satisfaction that, For instance Sri Surya questioned me how come the Secretary authorized me to get a better deal (For which Secretary doesn’t respond) on the other hand this member gives me a week time to get a deal if I can. NAKAL MAARNEKE LIYE BHI AKAL CHAHIYE. NARENDER ALIAS KRISHNA

Padmarao

September 6, 2008 12:46 PM


krish said...
Reply to padma rao,
First identify yourself. You are padma rao or padma rao lakkisetty ? Some time you write padma rao and sometime padma rao lakkisetty. Remember ; when point with one finger on others four fingers towards you.
Like your name I am krishna Nerender.But in the user name it is simply Krish. So do not waste your time in finding silly points.
We are also quickly understanidng your intentions in creatig confusisng the members.
You have till date not mentioned whether you are the plot owner.and you gave evasive reply as to the question of how many meetings you have attended. You have prestige to go to the society office for knowing how many members have signed the MOUs.
If you really follow the democratic norms why do not submit the list of persons opposing the decision of giving it to the developer.If the number is more I am ready to agree with your moves.You are reacting in a silly way to the members opposing your points.
So, Respected Sri.Padma RAo alias Padma Rao Lakkisetty garu please bring a builder with better terms or you come forward to construct the house in your ( till date it is not known ) plot which will be a great help to all the members including me
Till then let us stop in arguments and counter arguments in this forum.

September 6, 2008 11:41 PM


MOUSIGNED said...
Dear Society

I have a plot in the society and i signed on the MOU long back and have signed on ULC recently.

May i know what will happen tomorrow if INDU rejects to take it for Development by showig any cause( say because of lack of majority or so).

Why i got this doubt is
1. we are not paying for ULC.
2. we are not paying for Regularization.

Will society going to take responsibility for that ?

September 7, 2008 9:02 AM


Lakshman said...
Hello Krihna garu and Padma Rao garu

We are going on wrong track. Lets try solve the problem of our society instead of personal comments on each other.

This blog is created to comments on Society and to get the better deal for us.

September 7, 2008 9:48 AM


gopalnagarsociety said...
TO
ALL THE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY
& Bloggers of the Society

Everyone who has posted comments(raised doubts) in this blog and those who have doubts about the workings of society and doubts on Development are requested to approach the society office and have a face to face discussion with the Secretary of the Society on 23-09-2008 (Tuesday) between 10.00 AM to 02.00 PM and get their doubts clarified.

Everyone's presence is required.
Those who are unable to come, please send someone on their behalf for clarifications.

Thanking you

Secretary

September 8, 2008 12:37 AM


Pr Reddy said...
Dear Secretary garu,
I could not attend the meeting as I am currently residing out of country. It would be formal and helpful if you clarify details in the email.

I have few questions, I would ask if attend the meeting.

1. How did you/developer arrive to 10 sqft/sq yard of land area? Is it a market standard(I am sure it is not) or is it only the highest offer among the bids we recieved? Who are other potential developers?

2. What are the plot numbers which are in disputes/ULC? Please list all the plot numbers in duspute(legal issues) and under ULC.

3. What are the consequences I should be prepared for if I want to keep my plot and build a nice home for myself.

4. What was the offer we had/have from other developers like L&T? and reasons for not selecting these builders despite higher offer.

These are only few of many simple questions for which clarification is required. I appreciate your response for these questions.

Thanks,
Pr reddy.

September 8, 2008 9:50 PM


Lakshman said...
I am in US, so I could not attend the meeting

Request Suribabu garu, please posy the minuted of the meeting and the decision taken during the meeting..

await for MoM
Thanks...

September 9, 2008 7:40 AM


Hi All,

Here are the previous comments posted by the members. I copied them two before removing the blog.

Thanks,
Sasi.

sgarlap said...

Hello all, are there any updates about Gopal nagar society. Any information about happenings will be appreciated.

sgarlap said...

If anyone has information on the plots affected by ULC will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Sri

against MoU in Gopalnagar society said...

soon I wil tell my next course of action
padmarao

Family Receipes said...

Hello All,

Can some one shred the light on what is going on with Indu offer?

Did anyone get to meet the secretery last month and what kind of questions were raised and how did they respond?

Thanks,

Ramesh

Dr. Jaya said...

Hi All,
As I suspected, they removed the blog as our voices are against to their wishes. Its good that we are again together.

Do you guys have any information about the commenced meeting or any uptodate news about the society.

I wonder society people may do something silently...

regards,
Dr. Jaya

Ramesh said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ramesh said...

Hi all,
Any update from Society or Government in regards to OUR plots and regularization?

Thanks.
Ramesh

padmaja said...

Hi All,
Anybody knows any kind of information about our society? Please share that information.
Thank you,
Padmaja

Rahul said...

SG Estates Limited - Residential Apartments, Office Space in Vasundhara, Residential Flats in Ghaziabad
SG Estates Ltd. was incorporated in the year 1986 under the aegis of its Managing Director Mr. Subhash Gupta. It’s most important resource i.e. Human Resource comprises of highly qualified, young, dynamic, creative professionals with extraordinary business acumen and insatiable thirst to work with passion.
Keywords-> Residential Projects, Residential Projects in raj Nagar, Residential Projects in Raj Nagar Extension, commercial Projects in Vasundhara
SG ESTATES LTD
105-106, Deepshikha Tower, Rajendera Place, New Delhi-110008
Telephone: 011-42323230 (Hunting Lines)
Fax: 011-42323244
Email: -info@sgestates.in
Call@ 9999008503
www.sgestates.in

Sachin Kumar said...

Thanks for sharing this with us, I completely agree with you.
Call for Inquiry at any time or Free Demo..
Mobile: +91-9799950666 /555/444

housing society software | society management software | housing society accounting software